<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yamaha Pacifica 112</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guitarchasers.org/guchmain/archives/58/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guitarchasers.org/guchmain/archives/58</link>
	<description>Music &#38; Information for Guitarists &#38; Performers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noodler</title>
		<link>http://guitarchasers.org/guchmain/archives/58#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Noodler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guitarchasers.org/guchmain/archives/58#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I've got a Pacifica too and I love it.  Mine is a 311, I think.  I play it more than my Fender Tele, becuase it is just so comfortable.  A bit muddy when you roll off the tone pot, but that is my only criticism.  It's glossy timber, Tele shape with an ashtray bridge.  Feels solid, looks great.  Lots of twang.  Holds it's tune well.  I'll never sell it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a Pacifica too and I love it.  Mine is a 311, I think.  I play it more than my Fender Tele, becuase it is just so comfortable.  A bit muddy when you roll off the tone pot, but that is my only criticism.  It&#8217;s glossy timber, Tele shape with an ashtray bridge.  Feels solid, looks great.  Lots of twang.  Holds it&#8217;s tune well.  I&#8217;ll never sell it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
